David Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > I applied already the patches I thought were appropriate, > you had some crypto layer changes that you need to work > out with Herbert Xu before the rest can be applied. Should the rest of it go via Andrew's tree then? David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
- References:
- Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Remaining straight forward kthread API conversions...
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] net/rxrpc: Convert to kthread API.
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP should depend on MMU
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm] workqueue: debug possible endless loop in cancel_rearming_delayed_work
- Previous by thread: Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
- Next by thread: Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
- Index(es):
 |