Re: [PATCH] net/rxrpc: Convert to kthread API.

Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> Do those patches convert all this code over to full use of the kthread
> API?  Because it seems that a conversion would be straightforward, and
> is needed.

No.  They delete all that code entirely and use workqueues instead.  So, I
suppose merging Eric's patches first should be a simple matter of just
deleting his revised code instead.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] net/rxrpc: Convert to kthread API.
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] net/rxrpc: Convert to kthread API.
    • From: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
  • Remaining straight forward kthread API conversions...
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: [PATCH] net/rxrpc: Convert to kthread API.
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: CPU time limit patch / setrlimit(RLIMIT_CPU, 0) cheat fix
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC 0/8] Variable Order Page Cache
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] net/rxrpc: Convert to kthread API.
• Next by thread: Re: Remaining straight forward kthread API conversions...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]