Re: [PATCH] net/rxrpc: Convert to kthread API.

Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> Do those patches convert all this code over to full use of the kthread
> API?  Because it seems that a conversion would be straightforward, and
> is needed.

No.  They delete all that code entirely and use workqueues instead.  So, I
suppose merging Eric's patches first should be a simple matter of just
deleting his revised code instead.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH] net/rxrpc: Convert to kthread API.
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] net/rxrpc: Convert to kthread API.
  - From: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
- Remaining straight forward kthread API conversions...
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] net/rxrpc: Convert to kthread API.
  - From: David Howells <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: CPU time limit patch / setrlimit(RLIMIT_CPU, 0) cheat fix
Next by Date: Re: [RFC 0/8] Variable Order Page Cache
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] net/rxrpc: Convert to kthread API.
Next by thread: Re: Remaining straight forward kthread API conversions...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]