Re: [patch 20/20] Add apply_to_page_range() which applies a function to a pte range.

Matt Mackall wrote:
> Haven't thought a huge amount about that. Perhaps it's best done with
> the level 3 callback?
>   

Level 2, I think, assuming you count the pte pages as level 1.  I think
it can be dealt with, so long as it correctly skips level 1 callbacks
for superpages, and does the test after the level 2 callback has returned.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 20/20] Add apply_to_page_range() which applies a function to a pte range.
  - From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [patch 20/20] Add apply_to_page_range() which applies a function to a pte range.
  - From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 20/20] Add apply_to_page_range() which applies a function to a pte range.
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 20/20] Add apply_to_page_range() which applies a function to a pte range.
  - From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 10/28] i386: map enough initial memory to create lowmem mappings
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] nfs lockd reclaimer: Convert to kthread API
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 20/20] Add apply_to_page_range() which applies a function to a pte range.
Next by thread: Re: [patch 20/20] Add apply_to_page_range() which applies a function to a pte range.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]