Re: [RFC 0/8] Variable Order Page Cache

On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > We likely need actual defragmentation support.
> 
> To be honest it looks quite pointless before this is solved. So far it is
> not even clear if it is feasible to solve it.

We have done order 1 / 2 allocations for some limited purposes for some 
time (task struct etc). But you are right: We need to figure out how high 
we can go with Mel's antifrag and defrag work.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC 0/8] Variable Order Page Cache
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC 0/8] Variable Order Page Cache
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mtd_blkdevs: Convert to use the kthread API
• Next by Date: Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 0/8] Variable Order Page Cache
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC 0/8] Variable Order Page Cache
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]