Re: [PATCH] nfs4state reclaimer: Remove unnecessary allow_signal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 01:59 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> From: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
> 
> Cc: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
> Cc: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/nfs4state.c |    2 --
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
> index 5fffbdf..d16393f 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
> @@ -775,8 +775,6 @@ static int reclaimer(void *ptr)
>  	struct rpc_cred *cred;
>  	int status = 0;
>  
> -	allow_signal(SIGKILL);
> -
>  	/* Ensure exclusive access to NFSv4 state */
>  	lock_kernel();
>  	down_write(&clp->cl_sem);

Ditto...



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux