Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]

On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> i disagree that the user 'would expect' this. Some users might. Others 
> would say: 'my 10-thread rendering engine is more important than a 
> 1-thread job because it's using 10 threads for a reason'. And the CFS 
> feedback so far strengthens this point: the default behavior of treating 
> the thread as a single scheduling (and CPU time accounting) unit works 
> pretty well on the desktop.
> 
> think about it in another, 'kernel policy' way as well: we'd like to 
> _encourage_ more parallel user applications. Hurting them by accounting 
> all threads together sends the exact opposite message.

There are counter argouments too. Like, not every user knows if a certain 
process is MT or not. I agree though that doing accounting and fairness at 
a depth lower then USER is messy, and not only for performance.


- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
    • From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
    • From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
    • From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
    • From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix abs() macro to work with types wider than int
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] add two SCSI command opcodes
• Previous by thread: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
• Next by thread: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]