On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 09:09 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote: > > > With a heavily reniced X (perfectly fine), that should indeed solve my > > daily usage pattern nicely (always need godmode for shells, but not > > for mozilla and ilk. 50/50 split automatic without renice of entire > > gui) > > how about the first-approximation solution i suggested in the previous > mail: to add a per UID default nice level? (With this default defaulting > to '-10' for all root-owned processes, and defaulting to '0' for > everything else.) That would solve most of the current CFS regressions > at hand. That would make my kernel builds etc interfere with my other self's surfing and whatnot. With it by EUID, when I'm surfing or whatnot, the X portion of my Joe-User activity pushes the compile portion of root down in bandwidth utilization automagically, which is exactly the right thing, because the root me in not as important as the Joe-User me using the GUI at that time. If the idea of X disturbing root upsets some, they can move X to another UID. Generally, it seems perfect for here. -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- References:
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- Prev by Date: Re: Loud "pop" coming from hard drive on reboot
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm] workqueue: debug possible endless loop in cancel_rearming_delayed_work
- Previous by thread: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- Next by thread: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- Index(es):
![]() |