Re: [PATCH] fix OOM killing processes wrongly thought MPOL_BIND

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:35:22 +0100 (BST)
Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> wrote:

> I only have CONFIG_NUMA=y for build testing: surprised when trying a memhog
> to see lots of other processes killed with "No available memory (MPOL_BIND)".
> memhog is killed correctly once we initialize nodemask in constrained_alloc().
> 

thank you for catching bug.

Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>


> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
> ---
> Perhaps appropriate for 2.6.20-stable too - regression since 2.6.19.
> 
>  mm/oom_kill.c |    2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> --- 2.6.21-rc7/mm/oom_kill.c	2007-03-26 07:30:54.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/mm/oom_kill.c	2007-04-18 20:18:21.000000000 +0100
> @@ -176,6 +176,8 @@ static inline int constrained_alloc(stru
>  	struct zone **z;
>  	nodemask_t nodes;
>  	int node;
> +
> +	nodes_clear(nodes);
>  	/* node has memory ? */
>  	for_each_online_node(node)
>  		if (NODE_DATA(node)->node_present_pages)
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux