On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 12:32:40PM +0400, Pavel Emelianov ([email protected]) wrote:
> Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 12:16:18PM +0400, Pavel Emelianov ([email protected]) wrote:
> >> Sorry, I forgot to put netdev and David in Cc when I first sent it.
> >>
> >> There is a race between netlink_dump_start() and netlink_release()
> >> that can lead to the situation when a netlink socket with non-zero
> >> callback is freed.
> >
> > Out of curiosity, why not to fix a netlink_dump_start() to remove
> > callback in error path, since in 'no-error' path it removes it in
>
> Error path is not relevant here. The problem is that we
> keep a calback on a socket that is about to be freed.
Yes, you are right, that it will not be freed in netlink_release(),
but it will be freed in netlink_dump() after it is processed (in no-error
path only though).
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
