Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ?

On 4/17/07, Herbert Xu <[email protected]> wrote:

Yep.  We don't need such a flag anyway.  All we need is a way to tweak
the priority and Bob's your uncle.

Could you elaborate please, I don't see how you prevent others users
to use this module with priority.

Priority is a stuff that tells you which aes implementation to use but
it does not prevent an implementation to be used several times...

Thanks
--
Francis
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ?
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ?
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ?
    • From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: ZFS with Linux: An Open Plea
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Show slab memory usage on OOM and SysRq-M
• Previous by thread: Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ?
• Next by thread: Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]