* Peter Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > There's a lot of ugly code in the load balancer that is only there to > overcome the side effects of SMT and dual core. A lot of it was put > there by Intel employees trying to make load balancing more friendly > to their systems. What I'm suggesting is that an N CPUs per runqueue > is a better way of achieving that end. I may (of course) be wrong but > I think that the idea deserves more consideration than you're willing > to give it. i actually implemented that some time ago and i'm afraid it was ugly as hell and pretty fragile. Load-balancing gets simpler, but task picking gets alot uglier. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: "Michael K. Edwards" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- Prev by Date: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- Next by Date: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- Previous by thread: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- Next by thread: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- Index(es):