Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2

* Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Actually I think this is something that makes sense to add, even if 
> just for debugging, but maybe also for production, depending on how 
> much it impacts things. Child runs first is an heuristic optimisation 
> that exploits a VM detail (however fundamental). But for things that 
> don't exec right after forking (and maybe some things that do), it can 
> be nicer to reduce context switches, improve cache patterns, and allow 
> children to be load balanced away before touching memory, if 
> child_runs_first is turned off.

yeah, the primary intent was debug. Nick, am i confused to conclude that 
mainline in fact runs the _parent_ first, despite all the elaborate 
runqueue juggling we do there? This piece of code in wake_up_new_task() 
caught my eyes:

                                p->prio = current->prio;
                                p->normal_prio = current->normal_prio;
                                list_add_tail(&p->run_list, &current->run_list);
                                p->array = current->array;
                                p->array->nr_active++;
                                inc_nr_running(p, rq);

shouldnt the list_add_tail() be list_add(), so that task pickup sees the 
child first? Maybe we still do child-runs-first in practice, due to the 
timeslice and sleep average fixups that happen if the parent preempts, 
but the above piece of code seems a quite elaborate way of doing 
activate_task(). To have the child _before_ the parent we'd need the 
add-on patch below. But ... i could be wrong, this is just a quick 
thought.

	Ingo

---
 kernel/sched.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1685,7 +1685,7 @@ void fastcall wake_up_new_task(struct ta
 			else {
 				p->prio = current->prio;
 				p->normal_prio = current->normal_prio;
-				list_add_tail(&p->run_list, &current->run_list);
+				list_add(&p->run_list, &current->run_list);
 				p->array = current->array;
 				p->array->nr_active++;
 				inc_nr_running(p, rq);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2
    • From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2
    • From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]