Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:

> > ok, i've got something better to test: i separated the delta out 
> > into a more finegrained stack of 3 patches. You can pick them up 
> > from:
> > 
> >  http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/older/sched-cfs-v2-rc0.patch
> >  http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/older/sched-cfs-v2-rc0-preempt-fix.patch
> >  http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/older/sched-cfs-v2-rc0-child-runs-first.patch
> >  http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/older/sched-cfs-v2-rc0-misc.patch
> 
> Isn't that easier for everyone if you keep them as quilt series (ala 
> syslets)?

i _do_ have a quilt tree, but i never had the clean splitup above. Why? 
Because i worked on all of these aspects (and a whole lot of other 
aspects as well) in parallel during the past 2 days, back and forth, 
often mixing changes, etc. and there was never any clean splitup.

Now it turned out that the clean splitup of -rc0->final delta would ease 
Gene's testing so i created it. Note that this is just 30% of the total 
v1->v2 delta and i just saved the work of having to do a clean splitup 
of the other 70%. (and note that this splitup will be undone because it 
makes no sense for any potential upstream merge at all, it's only to 
ease testing for Gene)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/