Hi -
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 11:36:05PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> writes:
> > and [systemtap] does a lot of really wrong things in it's
> > runtime). [...]
(Thanks, Christoph, for at least a few specifics. Some of them have
already been dealt with in the recent past.)
> I must agree with that. Perhaps it would be good if its runtime code
> was posted to l-k at some point and reviewed in the standard way
> even when it isn't merged.
I'll let the runtime's maintainers judge whether this particular venue
would be helpful. But is the choice of venue really an obstacle?
Everyone who cares is *already* welcome to browse the code (available
on CVS, cvsweb, tarballs - would git help?), and critique it (e.g. on
our open public mailing list or via bugzilla).
http://sourceware.org/systemtap/getinvolved.html
- FChE
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/13] maps: pagemap, kpagemap, and related cleanups
- Re: [PATCH 0/13] maps: pagemap, kpagemap, and related cleanups
- Re: [PATCH 0/13] maps: pagemap, kpagemap, and related cleanups
- Re: [PATCH 0/13] maps: pagemap, kpagemap, and related cleanups
- Re: [PATCH 0/13] maps: pagemap, kpagemap, and related cleanups
- Re: [PATCH 0/13] maps: pagemap, kpagemap, and related cleanups
- Re: [PATCH 0/13] maps: pagemap, kpagemap, and related cleanups
- Re: [PATCH 0/13] maps: pagemap, kpagemap, and related cleanups
- Re: [PATCH 0/13] maps: pagemap, kpagemap, and related cleanups
- Re: [PATCH 0/13] maps: pagemap, kpagemap, and related cleanups
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]