Peter Williams wrote:
Are your new patches available somewhere for easy download or do I have
to try to dig them out of the mailing list archive? Or could you mail
them to me separately? I'm keen to see how you new scheduler proposal
works.
Forget about this. I found the patch.
After a quick look, I like a lot of what I see especially the removal of
the dual arrays in the run queue.
Some minor suggestions:
1. having defined DEFAULT_PRIO in sched.h shouldn't you use it to
initialize the task structure in init_task.h.
2. the on_rq field in the task structure is unnecessary as many years of
experience with ingosched in plugsched indicates that
!list_empty(&(p)->run_list does the job provided list_del_init() is used
when dequeueing and there is no noticeable overhead incurred so there's
no gain by caching the result. Also it removes the possibility of
errors creeping in due the value of on_rq being inconsistent with the
task's actual state.
3. having modular load balancing is a good idea but it should be
decoupled form the scheduler and provided as a separate interface. This
would enable different schedulers to use the same load balancer if they
desired.
4. why rename SCHED_OTHER to SCHED_FAIR? SCHED_OTHER's supposed to be
fair(ish) anyway.
Peter
--
Peter Williams [email protected]
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]