Re: Performance Stats: Kernel patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

On Sun 2007-04-15 03:21:57, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> At some point in the past, someone's attribution was stripped from:

Maxim's.

> >> +       return buffer + sprintf(buffer, "Nvcsw:\t%lu\n"
> >> +                           "Nivcsw:\t%lu\n",
> >> +                           p->nvcsw,
> >> +                           p->nivcsw);
> 
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 09:47:07AM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > We don't encrypt variable names like this.
> 
> nvcsw and nivcsw are conventional variable names for these quantities.

I can't decipher them and would not want users see them in /proc.


Would nonvoluntary_ctxt_switch be that much worse?

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux