Hi!
> > Are you _sure_ you have a 1-to-1 relationship here? No multiple devices
> > pointing to the same acpi node? Or the other way around? If so, you
> > are going to have to change the name to be something more unique.
>
> I've wondered that too. The short answer: APCI only supports 1-1
> here. It will emit warnings if it tries to bind more than one ACPI
...
> Assuming they all adopt that same "parallel tree" model, that seems
> like a good idea. The tools will likely need to understand how ACPI
> and OF differ, but there's no point in reserving more names than we
> really need. Though it may be that "parallel trees" should go away.
If mapping is indeed 1-to-1 in acpi... it would be nice to just merge
the trees.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
