Re: [RFC 1/1] Char: mxser_new, fix recursive locking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jiri Slaby wrote:
: On 4/14/07, Jan Yenya Kasprzak <[email protected]> wrote:
: >Jiri Slaby wrote:
: >: On 4/14/07, Jan Yenya Kasprzak <[email protected]> wrote:
: >: >~BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#0, sshd/1671, ffffffff80557780
: >: [...]
: >: >the write(1, "/file/name/...", ...) call returned -EIO.
: >:
: >: Just a question: both with mxser_new, right?
: >
: >        No. One side has a multiport C168H with mxser_new, and the other
: 
: I meant both lockup and EIO error -- I guess so from this line.

	Yes.

-Yenya


-- 
| Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak  <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.net - private}> |
| GPG: ID 1024/D3498839      Fingerprint 0D99A7FB206605D7 8B35FCDE05B18A5E |
| http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/    Journal: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/ |
> I will never go to meetings again because I think  face to face meetings <
> are the biggest waste of time you can ever have.        --Linus Torvalds <
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux