Re: GIT and the current -stable

* Brian Gernhardt ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hm.  I should drink my coffee, then read the mailing list, not the  
> other way around.  If you do update HEAD to be the most recent  
> stable, my thanks.  Apologies for the noise.

No problem, was a good suggestion (and it's done).

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- GIT and the current -stable
  - From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: GIT and the current -stable
  - From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: GIT and the current -stable
  - From: Brian Gernhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: GIT and the current -stable
  - From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: GIT and the current -stable
  - From: Brian Gernhardt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
Next by Date: Re: GIT and the current -stable
Previous by thread: Re: GIT and the current -stable
Next by thread: Re: GIT and the current -stable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]