* Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
> One other thing, what happens in the case of slow, frequency changing,
> are/or inaccurate clocks .. Is the old sched_clock behavior still
> tolerated?
yeah, good question. Yesterday i did a quick testboot with that too, and
it seemed to behave pretty OK with the low-res [jiffies based]
sched_clock() too. Although in that case things are much more of an
approximation and rounding/arithmetics artifacts are possible. CFS works
best with a high-resolution cycle counter.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
