Milind Arun Choudhary a écrit :
use set_current_state(TASK_*) instead of current->state = TASK_*, in fs/nfs
Signed-off-by: Milind Arun Choudhary <[email protected]>
---
idmap.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/idmap.c b/fs/nfs/idmap.c
index 9d4a6b2..054ca15 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/idmap.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/idmap.c
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ nfs_idmap_id(struct idmap *idmap, struct idmap_hashtable *h,
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
mutex_unlock(&idmap->idmap_im_lock);
schedule();
- current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
+ set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
remove_wait_queue(&idmap->idmap_wq, &wq);
mutex_lock(&idmap->idmap_im_lock);
Probably a dumb question, so please forgive me.
Why are you forcing a memory barrier here, (and also on your other patches).
Is'nt a __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); appropriate ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]