On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:46:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > If I want to run a system entirely from ram with a compressed filesystem
> > image mounted on /, is it better to store that image in a ramdisk, or on
> > a tmpfs and mount it via loopback?
>
> Store it all in ramfs, no loopback needed?
I used to put everything in a tmpfs on /, and that certainly works. But
most files in a typical image are rarely used and it's a pity to have
lots of little files taking up a 4k page each.
You get pretty big savings by compressing the system into a squashfs and
mounting that, so the question becomes: where to put the squashfs?
ramdisk or loopback mount it from tmpfs/ramfs?
iirc, the problems with loopback have to do with writeout, which isn't a
problem here since squashfs is readonly.
Jason
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
