On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 10:55:45PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Yeah. Note that there are some subtle but crutial differences between
> PlugSched (which Con used, and which i opposed in the past) and this
> approach.
> PlugSched cuts the interfaces at a high level in a monolithic way and
> introduces kernel/scheduler.c that uses one pluggable scheduler
> (represented via the 'scheduler' global template) at a time.
What I originally did did so for a good reason, which was that it was
intended to support far more radical reorganizations, for instance,
things that changed the per-cpu runqueue affairs for gang scheduling.
I wrote a top-level driver that did support scheduling classes in a
similar fashion, though it didn't survive others maintaining the patches.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
