Re: [patch] generic rwsems

On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:03PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Yes, this is the case on our 2 premiere SMP powerhouse architectures,
> sparc32 and parsic.

sparc32 is ultra-legacy and I have a tremendous amount of work to do on
SMP there. I don't feel that efficiency of locking primitives is a
crucial issue for sparc32.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] generic rwsems
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] generic rwsems
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] generic rwsems
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cciss: kconfig patch to make cciss dependent onscsi for SG_IO ioctl
• Next by Date: Re: How should an exit routine wait for release() callbacks?
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] generic rwsems
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] generic rwsems
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]