On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:33:16 -0400 (EDT) "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]> wrote: > > just something i threw together, not in final form, but it represents > tossing the legacy PM stuff. at the moment, the menuconfig entry for > PM_LEGACY lists it as "DEPRECATED", while the help screen calls it > "obsolete." that's a good sign that it's getting close to the time > for it to go, and the removal is fairly straightforward, but there's > no mention of its removal in the feature removal schedule file. One thing that comes to mind is that you will need some way to make sure that only one of ACPI and APM get initialized ... -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [email protected] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpjguIuX8N3x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Kill off legacy power management stuff.
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Kill off legacy power management stuff.
- References:
- [PATCH][RFC] Kill off legacy power management stuff.
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH][RFC] Kill off legacy power management stuff.
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/13] maps: pagemap, kpagemap, and related cleanups
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers.
- Previous by thread: [PATCH][RFC] Kill off legacy power management stuff.
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Kill off legacy power management stuff.
- Index(es):
 |