Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c

Andi Kleen wrote:
>> (This was under Xen, but there's no reason it couldn't happen on bare
>>   hardware.)
>>     
>
> Hmm, does Xen perhaps not use interrupt stacks?

Looks like that's all done in do_IRQ, so it should be independent of
whether its Xen or not.  And the stack overflow check is performed on
the main stack, before switching to the interrupt stack.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c
  - From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: intermittant petabyte usage reported with broadcom nic
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]