Re: Add a norecovery option to ext3/4?

>>>>> "BD" == Bill Davidsen <[email protected]> writes:

BD> In practice Linux has had lots of practice mounting garbage, and
BD> isn't likely to suffer terminal damage.

These days, with exposed USB ports and automount, it is rather
important that the kernel doesn't suffer terminal damage when mounting
garbage. It is too easy to exploit.


/Benny


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Add a norecovery option to ext3/4?
    • From: Samuel Thibault <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add a norecovery option to ext3/4?
    • From: Phillip Susi <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add a norecovery option to ext3/4?
    • From: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add a norecovery option to ext3/4?
    • From: Phillip Susi <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add a norecovery option to ext3/4?
    • From: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add a norecovery option to ext3/4?
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/7] [RFC] Battery monitoring class
• Next by Date: Re: is there any generic GPIO chip framework like IRQ chips?
• Previous by thread: Re: Add a norecovery option to ext3/4?
• Next by thread: Re: Add a norecovery option to ext3/4?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]