==> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:29:28 -0700, "Ken Chen" <[email protected]> said:
Ken> On 4/11/07, Ken Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
Ken> > On 4/11/07, Zach Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
Ken> > > First, I'll NAK this and all AIO patches until the patch
Ken> description > > says that it's been run through the regression
Ken> tests that we've started > > collecting in autotest. They're
Ken> trivial to run, never fear:
Ken> >
Ken> > OK. I will run those regression tests.
Ken> Unfortunately, the aio_dio_bugs test in autotest has bug in it
Ken> :-( We need stress test the "test code".
Ken> on stock 2.6.21-rc6 kernel:
Ken> [rock-me-baby]$ cd autotest/tests/aio_dio_bugs/src
Ken> [rock-me-baby]$ make [rock-me-baby]$
Ken> ./aio-free-ring-with-bogus-nr-pages
Ken> aio-free-ring-with-bogus-nr-pages: Error: io_setup returned -22,
Ken> expected -ENOMEM
Ken> hmm??? The problem is that the test code forgot to initialized
Ken> ctx variable and in the kernel, sys_io_setup returns EINVAL if
Ken> user address contain none-zero value.
Zach had already sent a fix for that. I wonder why it didn't go in.
I didn't see any response to Zach's request for code that actually
tests out the shared ring buffer. Do you have such code?
-Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
