> 1) When physical memory runs low, the memory manager will try to use
> memory currently allocated to the pagecache. Is this true?
Yes.
> 2) When vm.overcommit_memory = 2 (overcommit disabled), and memory runs
> low, it appears that the memory manager does not try to use memory
> currently allocated to pagecache. Is this true?
It does try, that doesn't mean it will succeed. If overcommit is disabled,
the OS must have enoug (RAM+swap) to handle the maximum memory consumption
is has allowed to take place.
Perhaps you are laboring under the incorrect assumption that the pagecache
can always be shrunk to zero? Not all the data in the pagecache is
discardable. For example, any page that has been modified from its disk copy
cannot be discarded.
> 3) Is it possible to disable the pagecache?
No, because huge amounts of capability would become impossible. It is not
even clear to me how you could execute self-modifying code without a
pagecache.
DS
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
