Re: [PATCH] kthread: Don't depend on work queues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/10, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> +int kthreadd(void *unused)
> +{
> +	/* Setup a clean context for our children to inherit. */
> +	kthreadd_setup();
> +
> +	current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
> +
> +	for (;;) {
> +		wait_event(kthread_create_work,
> +			   !list_empty(&kthread_create_list));
> +
> +		spin_lock(&kthread_create_lock);
> +		while (!list_empty(&kthread_create_list)) {

Do we need to check the condition under lock? We can miss an event,
but then it will be noticed by wait_event() above.

> +			struct kthread_create_info *create;
> +
> +			create = list_entry(kthread_create_list.next,
> +					    struct kthread_create_info, list);
> +			list_del_init(&create->list);
> +			spin_unlock(&kthread_create_lock);
> +
> +			create_kthread(create);
> +
> +			spin_lock(&kthread_create_lock);
> +		}
> +		spin_unlock(&kthread_create_lock);
> +	}

IOW,

	for (;;) {
		wait_event(kthread_create_work,
			   !list_empty(&kthread_create_list));

		while (!list_empty(&kthread_create_list)) {
			struct kthread_create_info *create;

			spin_lock(&kthread_create_lock);
			create = list_entry(kthread_create_list.next,
					    struct kthread_create_info, list);
			list_del_init(&create->list);
			spin_unlock(&kthread_create_lock);

			create_kthread(create);
		}
	}

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux