Re: [PATCH] kthread: Don't depend on work queues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/11, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:13:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > It should be calling try_to_freeze() somewhere anyway.  We may need to freeze
> > all tasks in some cases.
> 
> How about
> for (;;) {
> 	try_to_freeze();
> 
> ?

Why?

> This change allows us to make all the worker threads freezeable by default.
> >From cpu-hotplug perspective, helper_wq was the only singlethreaded
> non-freezeable workqueue.

I think Eric's patch is what you need. We should _not_ freeze kthreadd(), we
need kthread_create() after freezing. Now it doesn't depend on workqueues, we
can freeze them all, single-thread or not.

I like this patch.

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux