Re: [PATCH] Improve heuristic detecting sequential reads

> adaptive readahead?  Has been in -mm for a year.  Problem is, it is
> _so_ complete that I just don't know how to merge it.  It's huge, and
> only Wu understands it. So it's really rather stuck.

No benchmark numbers for/against it at all?

-Andi
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Improve heuristic detecting sequential reads
  - From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Improve heuristic detecting sequential reads
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Improve heuristic detecting sequential reads
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Why kmem_cache_free occupy CPU for more than 10 seconds?
Next by Date: [PATCH] ahci.c: remove non-existing SB600 raid id (re-send)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Improve heuristic detecting sequential reads
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Improve heuristic detecting sequential reads
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]