Re: Why kmem_cache_free occupy CPU for more than 10 seconds?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I got some new information:
Before soft lockup message is out, we have:
[root@nsgsh-dhcp-149 home]# cat /proc/slabinfo |grep buffer_head
buffer_head       10927942 10942560    120   32    1 : tunables   32
16    8 : slabdata 341955 341955      6 : globalstat 37602996 11589379
1174373    6                              0    1 6918 12166031 1013708
: cpustat 35254590 2350698 13610965 907286

Then after buffer_head is freed, we have:
[root@nsgsh-dhcp-149 home]# cat /proc/slabinfo |grep buffer_head
buffer_head         9542  36384    120   32    1 : tunables   32   16
 8 : slabdata   1137   1137    245 : globalstat 37602996 11589379
1174373    6                                  0    1 6983 20507478
1708818 : cpustat 35254625 2350704 16027174 1068367

Does this huge number of buffer_head cause the soft lockup?

Thanks,
Forrest

On 4/11/07, Pekka Enberg <[email protected]> wrote:
On 4/11/07, Zhao Forrest <[email protected]> wrote:
> We're using RHEL5 with kernel version 2.6.18-8.el5.
> When doing a stress test on raw device for about 3-4 hours, we found
> the soft lockup message in dmesg.
> I know we're not reporting the bug on the latest kernel, but does any
> expert know if this is the known issue in old kernel? Or why
> kmem_cache_free occupy CPU for more than 10 seconds?

Sounds like slab corruption. CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB should tell you more.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux