* Andrew Morton ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:15:39 +0900 Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The problem is that to use hard_smp_processor_id in UP kernels just
> > including linux/smp.h does not suffice anymore. Now
> > hard_smp_processor_id is architecture specific code and consequently
> > asm/smp.h should be included explicitly.
>
> yeah. The fact that linux/smp.h only exposes asm/smp.h if CONFIG_SMP hits
> us again and again and again. It would be good to fix that up, I guess by
> including asm/smp.h unconditionally from within linux/smp.h.
>
> But that's a separate little project.
>
> > Mathieu, does the (untested) patch below fix this issue?
>
With this patch, sparc64 builds correctly. Thanks!
> I'll test it.
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
