On Tuesday 10 April 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> That's why I feel thread creation -- cheap under Linux -- is quite
> appropriate for many of these situations.
Maybe that (thread creation) can be done at open(), socket-creation,
service request, syscall or whatever event triggers a driver/subsystem
to actually queue work into a thread.
And when there is a close(), socket-destruction, service completion
or whatever these threads can be marked for destruction and destroyed
by a timer or even immediately.
Regards
Ingo Oeser
--
If something is getting cheap, it is getting wasted just because it is cheap.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]