Gene Heskett wrote:
YOU Tell the tar people, they are flabbergasted that linux is apparently
the only unstable OS that tar can be run on.
How about cygwin/windows? It has no concept of static device numbers.
And what about external usb disks on any other unix os? Surely they
don't have static minor device numbers in the face of hot plugging?
The bug is in tar and that is what needs fixed. It should not attach
any meaning to the device number, but rather should assume that the
admin knows what he is doing when he said to backup a given path using a
given incremental backup log, and that he isn't yanking tar's chain and
pointing it to a different path between incremental backups.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
