Re: [PATCH] Clean up x86 control register and MSR macros

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:


Is having separate bit numbers and masks useful?  If so, is it worth
doing for the others?

I presume it's useful, or at least *used* in the current code, sincethat was there already. If deemed useful, it's something we could addto the other bitmasks.


	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Clean up x86 control register and MSR macros
  - From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

References:
- [no subject]
  - From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Clean up x86 control register and MSR macros
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: prevent auto select of mwait_idle for AMD CPUs
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] console UTF-8 fixes
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Clean up x86 control register and MSR macros
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Clean up x86 control register and MSR macros
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]