Re: [PATCH] Clean up x86 control register and MSR macros

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

Is having separate bit numbers and masks useful?  If so, is it worth
doing for the others?

I presume it's useful, or at least *used* in the current code, since that was there already. If deemed useful, it's something we could add to the other bitmasks.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Clean up x86 control register and MSR macros
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [no subject]
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Clean up x86 control register and MSR macros
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: prevent auto select of mwait_idle for AMD CPUs
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] console UTF-8 fixes
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Clean up x86 control register and MSR macros
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Clean up x86 control register and MSR macros
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]