* Russell King <[email protected]> wrote:
> One per PC card socket to avoid the sysfs locking crappyness that
> would otherwise deadlock, and to convert from the old unreadable state
> machine implementation to a much more readable linearly coded
> implementation.
>
> Could probably be eliminated if we had some mechanism to spawn a
> helper thread to do some task as required which didn't block other
> helper threads until it completes.
looks like the perfect usecase for threadlets. (threadlets only use up a
separate context if necessary and can be coded in the familiar
sequential/linear model)
(btw., threadlets could in theory be executed in irq context too, and if
we block on anything it gets bounced off to a real context - although
this certainly pushes the limits and there would still be some deadlock
potential for things like irq-unsafe non-sleeping locks (spinlocks,
rwlocks).)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
