Hi.
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 15:03 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 8 April 2007 23:07, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> [--snip--]
> > > > Normal usage in both cases is simply iterating through the list, so I
> > > > guess the cost would be approximately the same.
> > > >
> > > > Deletion could would include rebalancing for the rb_nodes.
> > >
> > > In swsusp the deletions are needed only if there's an error.
> >
> > When freeing swap at the end of the cycle?
>
> That depends on what you mean by 'the end'. :-)
>
> We free swap if the image saving fails only, since it's allocated after we've
> created the image. After the resume, the state of swap from before the image
> creation is the current one anyway.
Ah, of course. I forgot that temporarily.
Nigel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
