Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code

On Apr 9 2007 10:53, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
>
>The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
>well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks.  For detailed
>announcement, see end of this email.

I have to seriously ask: why don't we consider aufs? Without
readvertising its simple codebase, unionfs was (version 1.5pre) not
able to be used as a root filesystem when one of its branches is nfs.
(I figure I should build a testcase for that know that I had
a way to reproduce it for some time.)

Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code
  - From: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children.
Next by Date: Re: Ten percent test
Previous by thread: Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code
Next by thread: [PATCH (revised)] device_schedule_callback needs a module reference
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]