On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:16:59 PDT, [email protected] said: > > I am not looking to defend Hans - he is likely to be in jail and no > > longer a factor for a long time. Nor am I looking to make or support > > claims for Reiser4. > > Why not defend Hans? He is in jail on what appear to be trumped-up > charges, just like the trumped-up complainants about his filesystem. The charges certainly appear to be a lot more serious than "trumped-up". All the same, I hope that Hans is accorded a fair trial and given a chance to clear his name. However, whether he's innocent or guilty, he *is* "out of play" for the foreseeable future. And "Where is the maintainer?" *is* a legitimate question when contemplating including a large chunk of code in the kernel. Hans is out of play, Namesys may or may not survive the loss of Hans, and there isn't any signs of support outside Namesys. So if it merges, who will get stuck with supporting it? (I won't bother replying to the rest of your conspiracy theories...)
Attachment:
pgpk11dm2RkaT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] Apple SMC driver - fix input device
- Next by Date: Re: Add a norecovery option to ext3/4?
- Previous by thread: Re: Troll Of The Year
- Next by thread: Re: REISER4 FOR INCLUSION IN THE LINUX KERNEL.
- Index(es):
 |