Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver

Alan Cox wrote:

Then no SFF hardware can use ata_irq_ack. Not one card: Because in every

OK

We should just rename ata_irq_ack(). It is in libata-sff, so it's either
wrong (missing a test), or in the wrong file completely.

There is plenty of BMDMA-specific stuff in libata-sff, so neither assertion is correct.

It's fine to rename it, though.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Troll Of The Year (Was: REISER4 FOR INCLUSION IN THE LINUX KERNEL.)
• Next by Date: Re: [BUG] scheduler: first timeslice of the exiting thread
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]