Re: Ten percent test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 00:08 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 09 April 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> >
> >Actually, there was practically nil interest in testing.  We made a
> >couple of minor adjustments to the interactivity logic, and all went
> >quiet, so I didn't think it was enough of a problem to require more
> >intrusive countermeasures.
> >
> >	-Mike
> 
> Does one of these messages have a url so I can test the latest of your 
> patches for -rc6?  Or was the one Ingo sent the most recent?

No, my tree has a bugfix and some other adjustments that try to move the
balance closer to fair without sacrificing interactivity.

> Putting that url in your sig would be nice, and might result in its 
> getting a lot more exersize which should = more feedback.

When I get it cleaned up and better tested, I'll post again.  If you
want, I'll CC you... willing victims are a highly valued commodity :)

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux