On Saturday, 7 April 2007 10:48, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:25 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > [...] Soeren, can you confirm that you are using a !CONFIG_SMP kernel,
> > > and if yes, does the patch below fix the resume problem for you?
> >
> > hm, you seem to have a CONFIG_SMP=y kernel. I dont immediately see where
> > we re-enable interrupts in the SMP case, but could you try my patch
> > nevertheless
>
> We do in on_each_cpu() unconditionally. I missed that.
BTW, the on_each_cpu() in clock_was_set() is unnecessary, because
timekeeping_resume() is always run on one CPU.
Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
