* Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> so
>
> - your code only gets publically tested in its against-staircase
> version
>
> - the against-mainline version will get merged without having been
> publically tested outside of staircase
>
> which is probably all OK for a 2.6.22-rc1 thing, provided Ingo can
> give a confident ack.
it looks good to me - and once i get a non-whitespace-damaged patch i'll
put it into -rt so we'll have testing. (this patch should have at most a
latency impact, if we forget to preempt somewhere, and -rt users are
quite touchy about latencies.)
> Where are we at with staircase anyway? Is it looking like a 2.6.22
> thing? I don't personally think we've yet seen enough serious
> performance testing to permit a merge, apart from other issues...
yes, that's my thinking too at the moment. I'd also like to see a
summary of 'open design questions' list from Mike (if Mike has
time/energy for that?) - many questions were raised, a good number of
them were answered, various changes done to SD but there's no good
summary of the current state of affairs.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
