Re: [patch 07/20] Allow paravirt backend to choose kernel PMD sharing

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Something like that.  I don't want to redo my patch if we're going to change
> your patch ;)
>   

OK.  I won't specifically redo it on top of your patches, but I'll
rework it to remove the inline function and add the if() statement.  Do
you want an incremental update or a complete replacement?

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 07/20] Allow paravirt backend to choose kernel PMD sharing
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [patch 07/20] Allow paravirt backend to choose kernel PMD sharing
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 07/20] Allow paravirt backend to choose kernel PMD sharing
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 07/20] Allow paravirt backend to choose kernel PMD sharing
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: tg3: unable to handle null pointer dereference
Next by Date: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: handle spaces in array size
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 07/20] Allow paravirt backend to choose kernel PMD sharing
Next by thread: Re: [patch 07/20] Allow paravirt backend to choose kernel PMD sharing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]