On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 11:03 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Thursday 05 April 2007 21:54, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > - fiftyp.c: noticeable, but alot better than previously!
>
> fiftyp.c seems to have been stumbled across by accident as having an effect
> when Xenofon was trying to recreate Mike's 50% x 3 test case. I suggest a ten
> percent version like the following would be more useful as a test for the
> harmful effect discovered in fiftyp.c. (/me throws in obligatory code style
> change).
>
> Starts 15 processes that sleep ten times longer than they run. Change forks to
> 15 times the number of cpus you have and it should work on any size hardware.
I was more focused on the general case, but all I should have to do to
de-claw all of these sleep exploits is account rr time (only a couple of
lines, done and building now). It's only a couple of lines.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
