On Tue 2007-02-20 15:33:18, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 10:22 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > But __be32 will catch the same errors these days because the be/le
> > types use __bitwise now, right? So use of the __be32/__be64 types should
> > be preferred since it also will work with sparse, I would think.
>
> Does __bitwise work in gcc? I thought it was only for sparse?
Hmm... if you have superior endian-debugging infrastructure, perhaps
you should just move rest of kernel to it? Having two endian-debugging
infrastructures is ugly...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]