Re: [PATCH] mm/mincore: Return EFAULT when passed an invalid address.

On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 01:05:27AM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> No, I think you're getting confused by the way Linus uses access_ok
> on the address range given with the access_ok on the vector address.

	Whoops.  Sorry for the noise.

Joel

-- 

Life's Little Instruction Book #451

	"Don't be afraid to say, 'I'm sorry.'"

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (650) 506-8127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- mincore returning -ENOMEM instead of -EFAULT
  - From: Joel Becker <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] mm/mincore: Return EFAULT when passed an invalid address.
  - From: Joel Becker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] mm/mincore: Return EFAULT when passed an invalid address.
  - From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Serial related oops
Next by Date: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] mm/mincore: Return EFAULT when passed an invalid address.
Next by thread: Re: mincore returning -ENOMEM instead of -EFAULT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]