Re: [PATCH,RESEND 2/3] cpufreq_ondemand.c: don't use _WORK_NAR

On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 12:35:06AM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
 > Looks like dbs_timer() is very careful wrt per_cpu(cpu_dbs_info),
 > and it doesn't need the help of WORK_STRUCT_NOAUTOREL.
 > 
 > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
 > Acked-By: David Howells <[email protected]>

This is sitting in cpufreq.git already.
I'll ask Linus to pull when he gets back.

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH,RESEND 2/3] cpufreq_ondemand.c: don't use _WORK_NAR
  - From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Patch 2/2] cciss: supercedes add shutdown support (replaces reboot notifier)
Next by Date: radeon breaks with clocksource_jiffies
Previous by thread: [PATCH,RESEND 2/3] cpufreq_ondemand.c: don't use _WORK_NAR
Next by thread: [PATCH] 3c59x: Handle pci_enable_device() failure while resuming
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]